Each gauge below is one the dashboard tracks. The point is not to crown a winner. It is to see
what each one shows, and what it leaves out.
The total value of goods and services produced, inflation-adjusted.
What it's good for
- One comparable number across countries and decades.
- Captures real production broadly.
- Standardized, and revised on a schedule.
What it misses
- Silent on who receives the gains.
- Counts cleanup and rebuilding as positive.
- Whippy quarter to quarter, and distorted by one-offs.
Latest $24.2T, Jan 2026 · FRED GDPC1 · full history →
The share of people who want work and cannot find it.
What it's good for
- Monthly and timely; it often moves first.
- Tied closely to how people feel.
- Intuitive and widely understood.
What it misses
- Leaves out discouraged and underemployed workers.
- Early job counts get revised hard.
- Can look fine while job quality erodes.
Latest 4.3%, May 2026 · FRED UNRATE · full history →
The total number of jobs on US payrolls outside farming.
What it's good for
- A broad monthly count of where the jobs are.
- Deep history, back to 1939.
- The figure the Fed and markets watch closely.
What it misses
- Counts jobs, not people; two part-time jobs count twice.
- The first print is revised for two more months.
- Says nothing about pay or hours.
Latest 159.0M, May 2026 · FRED PAYEMS · full history →
The share of working-age adults either holding a job or looking for one.
What it's good for
- Counts people the unemployment rate sets aside, including those who stopped looking.
- A read on the size of the workforce, not just who is hired.
- Monthly, with history back to 1948.
What it misses
- Demographics move it; an aging population pulls it down on its own.
- Silent on whether the available jobs are good ones.
- A national rate hides who is in the workforce and who is out.
Latest 61.8%, May 2026 · FRED CIVPART · full history →
Whether the typical weekly paycheck is growing faster than prices, after inflation.
What it's good for
- Cuts through nominal raises to what a paycheck actually buys.
- Speaks to living standards, not just national output.
- One read on whether work is getting people ahead.
What it misses
- A median; it hides who got the raise and who did not.
- Swings hard when inflation moves, even if pay holds steady.
- Says nothing about hours, benefits, or job security.
Latest +0.8%, Jan 2026 · FRED LES1252881600Q · full history →
How fast consumer prices are rising compared with a year ago.
What it's good for
- Measures the cost squeeze households feel.
- Monthly and granular.
- Drives Federal Reserve policy.
What it misses
- Falling inflation is not falling prices; the level stays high.
- One basket cannot match every household.
- Energy swings can swamp the signal short-term.
Latest 4.2%, May 2026 · FRED CPIAUCSL · full history →
The Federal Reserve's policy rate, which sets borrowing costs across the economy.
What it's good for
- Shows the Fed's read of the economy in one number.
- Drives mortgage, card, and loan rates.
- Signals whether policy is fighting inflation or weakness.
What it misses
- A blunt tool; it hits the whole economy at once.
- Effects arrive with long and variable lags.
- Says nothing about who feels the rate most.
Latest 3.63%, May 2026 · FRED FEDFUNDS · full history →
The market yield on a 10-year US Treasury.
What it's good for
- A live read on expected growth, inflation, and rates.
- Anchors mortgage and long-term borrowing costs.
- Set by buyers and sellers, not an agency.
What it misses
- Moves on expectations, which can be wrong.
- Blends several forces into one number.
- Says nothing about who borrows at it.
Latest 4.45%, Jun 11, 2026 · FRED DGS10 · full history →
The gap between the 10-year and 2-year Treasury yields, the slope of the yield curve.
What it's good for
- A negative reading has come before most recent recessions.
- Set by the market, distilling rate and growth expectations into one number.
- Daily, and watched closely as a warning gauge.
What it misses
- It has led recessions, not caused them; the lag has run from months to years.
- It gives false alarms; not every inversion is followed by a downturn.
- Signals roughly when, never how deep or why.
Latest +0.39 pp, Jun 12, 2026 · FRED T10Y2Y · full history →
The output of US factories, mines, and utilities, as an index.
What it's good for
- A monthly read on the physical economy.
- Long history, back to 1919.
- Sensitive to the manufacturing cycle.
What it misses
- Manufacturing is a shrinking share of a service economy.
- An index, not dollars or jobs.
- Weather and strikes can swing it.
Latest 102.5, Apr 2026 · FRED INDPRO · full history →
What Americans spent at stores and restaurants in a month.
What it's good for
- A fast read on consumer demand, which is most of the economy.
- Monthly, and released early.
- Broad coverage of spending.
What it misses
- Nominal dollars, so inflation alone can lift it.
- The advance estimate is revised.
- Counts spending, not whether people can afford it.
Latest $757B, Apr 2026 · FRED RSAFS · full history →
The number of new homes builders broke ground on, at an annual rate.
What it's good for
- A leading indicator; building responds early to rates.
- Ties to jobs, materials, and confidence.
- Decades of monthly history.
What it misses
- Volatile month to month.
- Weather-sensitive.
- Starts are not completions; plans change.
Latest 1.47M, Apr 2026 · FRED HOUST · full history →
How confident households feel about the economy and their own finances.
What it's good for
- Captures felt experience that output data cannot.
- Predicts spending and mood.
- Decades of consistent monthly history.
What it misses
- Noisy, and swayed by the news cycle.
- Feelings are not a substitute for output data.
- Can diverge from how people actually behave.
Latest 49.8, Apr 2026 · FRED UMCSENT · full history →